i3D^® Method vs. Conventional Tensile Test – Detailed Cost Comparison

This comparison highlights the economic differences between the modern i3D^® indentation method and the conventional tensile test, based on realistic parameters. The assessment considers machine investments, specimen preparation, personnel effort, and total costs over five years for a total of 52,000 stress–strain curves.

The i3D^® method saves over €1.34 million compared to the conventional tensile test at the same number of tests (52,000 stress–strain curves in 5 years). By eliminating time-consuming specimen preparation and significantly reducing personnel requirements, i3D^® is particularly suitable for series testing, R&D, and quality assurance. Integrated automatic quality control and direct testing on the component also make the method technologically superior.