Imprintec product overview

Products

Which system fits your testing task?

Whether you need a fast entry into Indentation Plastometry, automated mapping, combined hardness testing or process-near integration, the decisive factors are the part, the critical zone, the required material property and the throughput.

Product family

Five system classes for clearly different tasks.

The cards link core features directly to their practical value: easier entry, more points per part, combined testing routines or tighter integration into QA and process logic.

System logic

Features only matter when they create a clear benefit in daily work.

That is why the portfolio is not read through hardware labels, but through workflow impact: lower entry barriers, more points per part, fewer method breaks or tighter integration into QA and process.

Lower entry barrier

Compact platforms and fast cycles help wherever local material properties should be built up in-house, without moving straight into maximum automation depth and investment.

More zones per part

Axis systems, camera logic and automated routines become valuable when many positions, grids or weld paths must be processed reproducibly.

One platform instead of a method break

Combined hardness-testing and local-property workflows save time and handovers when hardness values and local material data are needed together.

Closer to QA and process

Process-near integration creates real value only when material data has to be available inside the actual decision workflow, not only in the laboratory.

Start in the lab first, or move directly to your own system?

Not every task justifies an in-house system immediately. If the specimen, the zone, the target property or the evaluation path are still open, a lab start is often the faster and more economical way to reach a robust decision.

An in-house system becomes meaningful when local material properties are needed repeatedly, teams should work independently or throughput, automation and reproducibility become a permanent requirement.

  • start in the lab when the measurement target, the zone or the part logic still need validation
  • choose Eco or Pro when local properties should be built up permanently in-house
  • choose mBV or BVR when hardness testing and local material insight should be organised together
  • choose Inline when testing should move closer to the process, the part or the production line

Which system class solves which problem?

The product overview is deliberately not just a device list. It leads from the actual selection problem to the right Indentation Plastometry system class: economical entry, high point counts, combined hardness testing or process-near integration.

That means the decision is not prepared only through a datasheet, but through cycle time, zone logic, team role, repeat frequency and the real workflow.

  • WLI Eco for a fast entry, smaller teams and economical in-house availability
  • WLI Pro for mapping, high point counts, screening and automated routines
  • mBV for lab and QA workflows that combine hardness testing with local material properties
  • BVR for robust, serial-process routines with a higher degree of automation
  • Inline for projects where material data should feed directly into QA or process decisions

When the discussion becomes genuinely useful

A useful first discussion usually needs less information than expected. Once the part, the critical zone, the required property and the rough cycle-time or quantity logic are clear, the sensible system class can usually be narrowed down quickly.

That is where the real call to action begins, not after the last datasheet, but as soon as it is clear which internal decision needs to become faster and more reliable.

  • name the part or specimen type
  • define the critical zone or measurement position
  • state the required result, such as yield strength Rᶦₚ₀.₂, tensile strength Rᶦₘ, a stress-strain curve or a hardness comparison
  • describe the rough quantity, cycle time or recurrence

Next step

Narrow down the right system class now.

Once the part, the zone and the target value are clear, it is usually possible to decide quickly whether Eco, Pro, mBV, BVR, Inline or a laboratory start is the right next step.

Which system question would you like to clarify?

Describe the part, the critical zone, the target property or the required workflow. That makes it easier to narrow down whether Eco, Pro, mBV, BVR, Inline or a lab start is the best fit.

Your contact details

Use this page for product selection, or as an entry into a demo or laboratory discussion.

Official form

Privacy settings

Website data usage.

Essential technologies are required. With your consent, we measure usage and channel performance. No personalized advertising is used on this website.

Statistics: website performance. Marketing: campaign measurement. Consent can be changed at any time. Privacy policy

Selection

Choose in detail which categories may be used.